"Much ado about Nothing" by William Shakespeare

Words... back... or something. The thing is that now, this is supposed to talk about... nothing! Nothing what? Oh, right. Much ado, much to do, about... no-thing. Even though the title of this story, play, movie, etc., originally by William Shakespeare, can have many meanings and connotations, like the one which has a sexual menaing, or the one where nothing (notting) means to spy someone, I will focus on the "no-thing" thing about this "nothing" play. 

What is this supposed to mean? That nothing happened in the end? That every event just happened and it was just for nothing because everything would have run its course without all the drama? Is it that Shakeaspeare considered all the muttering and love and relationships a really huge "nothing"? Maybe, but that is not up to me to interpret.  

What I think is that in the end, what counted was inside the characters, and sooner or later, it would have appeared, through one means or the others.  Beatrice and Benedick, they both loved each other so secretly, that one day, maybe, without others' "help", their love would have ocme out to surface for them and everyone to see. Claudio and Hero, well, what a pair of confused and tender-lovings! 

Maybe the end as we know it would not have ended that way if no one would have interferred. I mean, it would have ended with Claudio's death, with Don Pedro's one by his evil brother, with all the "loving couples" being together in the end, wether in life or death (as in R & J, in the case of Claudio and Hero), or nothing could have happened, just the prince and everyone else arriving to Messina, doing whatever they went to do, and bye-bye. Nothing, nothing could have happened, and nothing happened, so, there was too much doing about just nothing. 

William Shakespeare

I could start by saying when our dear friend Will was born, or everything he did and did not, but I think there is one important thing: what if Shakespeare had never existed?

We all know (as the world in general) about Romeo and Juliet, maybe about Hamlet's quote "to be or not to be", or about the Globe... and everything ends up relating to dear Willy. But what if this great playwright had never put the stereotypes and famous quotes in history? Maybe nothing would have happened: we could have had another typical model to stand for the well-known "Romeo", or tragedies would not be represented with a skull because of the play Hamlet, but maybe with a knife stabbing a heart, or swords crossed (or swords crossed with a skull haha) But anyway, I cannot buy the fact that Shakespeare was that important. Yes, I like his work, I've seen a thousand representations of Romeo and Juliet and like to know about him, his times, etc. But besides all that, I think of William Shakespeare as a very good playwright that was able to become popular by accident. Then, his work started spreading like smoke and everyone soon knew about this guy, or about his work. Only by accident was that the stereotypes we have today are what they are, and the sound to his name is known by most of the people, even though they might not know a thing about him. 

He was born as everyone else, wrote as anyone else could have, and reached fame as everyone else could have. Destiny? I cannot say, but he is a guy that should be very credited for many of the "lettered" world we have today, and after about 400 years after his death, he is still part of our world. So yes, nothing could have happened, but after all, he left his print and is present somehow.